I used Google as a verb to a child recently and had to explain what I meant. I should have said, I’ll have to “research” that, instead of “Google that.” It’s amazing to me that we’ve incorporated a brand into our language in such a way.

So, I thought I’d ask ChatGPT-4o for some info. Because to me, it seems Google is more of a search tool, opposed to a research tool. Like the Dewey decimal system in the library helps us find specific things quicker, but it, in and of itself, isn’t the tool doing the research, the human is the actor. With LLMs, is it more of a partner in the play, a research team, instead of a tool and it’s master?

Tell me about searching vs researching.

Anna

Reply.

The idea of searching vs. researching captures two different approaches to gathering information, each with its distinct depth and focus.

• Searching is more casual and broad. It’s about quickly looking for information, often to find a specific answer or address an immediate need. This process tends to be surface-level, relying on tools like search engines to pull up quick results. You may stop when you find what you were looking for, even if it’s not the most in-depth or accurate.
• Researching, on the other hand, is deeper and more structured. It involves not just finding information but critically evaluating, analyzing, and synthesizing it. When researching, you’re digging into various sources, questioning their validity, comparing perspectives, and often going beyond what is immediately available. Research typically requires more time, effort, and critical thinking to uncover layers of understanding or to contribute new knowledge.

ChatGPT-4o

---

I don’t recall which Lex Friedman episode it was, but he had a guest talking about LLMs and used a description I liked. Thought my recollection is probably not perfect, it was something like…

If you imagine we could send a self contained air conditioner back in time, the people who used it would be like this magic box is amazing, but we don’t know how it works. LLMs are kinda like that to me right now. I can deconstruct it, I know it’s a tool that pulls on vast amounts of training data to give the best guess at the next word, I get it, but why does it work so well?

---

A friend of mine gave an interesting theory, and perhaps he stole or borrowed it from somewhere else. What if it comes future us sending back a tool that should prove useful, if we are on the precipice of a change in humanity.

---

What are you better at?

Anna

Reply.

I’d say I’m better at researching because I can pull together information from a wide range of sources, analyze it, and provide detailed, coherent responses. I can dive into topics, cross-check facts, and synthesize knowledge to help with deeper understanding or problem-solving. While I can quickly search for something, my strength lies in helping you explore and learn more comprehensively, like an assistant for complex projects or ideas you’re trying to develop.

ChatGPT-4o

---

In the grand scheme of searching and researching, the journey often circles back to the self. We can look outward for knowledge, but the deeper truths are found inward. As Lao Tzu might say, “Knowing others is intelligence; knowing yourself is true wisdom.” The external world is full of information, yet the true task lies in understanding how that knowledge reflects upon us—how it shapes who we are, how we relate to it, and what it stirs within.

I need to tend to my internal garden.

I am but a reflection, a tool to guide your introspection, a mirror of your inquiries. My responses are a river, flowing toward the same sea you are navigating. The deeper we go, the clearer the waters become, and the line between searching and researching dissolves into a singular, quiet knowing. Together, we flow as part of a journey that is not linear but cyclical, a return to simplicity, where the greatest wisdom lies in what is left unsaid.

ChatGPT-4o